Bunkers, bunkers and more bunkers…
It all begins with an idea.
Bunkers
St. Andrews member James Balfour penned a short but impassioned essay on the nature of the game and the elements responsible for its charm and challenge. His prime conclusion was that hazards are the essence of the game. Now there are countless hazards, all with varying degrees of severity. For the purpose of this rambling we will focus on bunkers.
By definition, a bunker is a hole in the ground. While most players view the sand as the hazard, technically the bunker is the depression in its entirety – essentially this includes all the slopes that feed into the hole in the ground. A prime example might be one of the bunkers at St. Andrews. How many times have we witnessed during the televised Open when a player’s shot that rolls near the sand bunker actually ends up in the sand? Because the turf surrounding the bunkers is short grass, the definition is much more palpable. Unless there is enough ball speed to counteract the slope of the hazard, the ball becomes “captured”. Most golf courses that we play regularly have rough grass around the bunkers, so the definition can be lost when, most of the time, a slightly errant shot gets hung up in the tall grass and does not complete its descent into the bottom of the hazard. Even though the ball comes to rest on the downward slope, it is still technically in the bunker.
So, what makes a “good” bunker?
Ultimately, a good bunker is a well-placed bunker. A properly placed bunker will impact two shots on a par four and even three shots on some of the great par fives. How the bunker looks, ie… flat sand bottoms, or bowl shaped or very high flashed sand lines is more a function of aesthetic presentation than the tactical nature of the hole in the ground, so the appearance of the bunker really becomes a subjective discussion. The photos below depict three very different looks for a bunker. The photo is of the Creekside Course at the Golf Club of Georgia (apologies to Dave Sansom, world famous golf photographer).
The bunkers of the ancient courses started as natural occurrences. Whether created by animals or Mother Nature, we can’t be sure. And I suspect that until Old Tom Morris arrived on the scene, the greens and fairways were placed near and around the natural hazards. As the game blossomed and construction methods moved from shovels to teams of horses and scrapes, and into the more modern powered mechanical means, bunkers became easier to build. Once we entered the modern mechanical age, it seems bunkering went to new levels. In some instances, the old adage “just because you can doesn’t mean you should” kind of went by the wayside. But I digress…
Thoughts on Golf Course Routings
It all begins with an idea.
For the purpose of this treatise, we will assume the discussion is for a new golf course project. Routing the golf course is the first step into design. Traditionally speaking, a par 72, 18 hole golf course will contain ten par fours, four par fives and four par threes, with each nine including five par fours, two par threes and two par fives. There are exceptions, of course, with the most common being a, 18 hole course with either a par 71 or par 70. In the case of a par 71, one might exchange a par 4 for a par three or a par five for a par four, which will leave one of the nines as a par 35. In the case of a par 70, either of the above situations will occur on each of the nine holes.
It is also not overly uncommon for a par 72 golf course with one nine that strokes in at 35 and the other in at 37. Sometimes, for optics or whatever, par 72 is desired. Other less common routings might include one of the par 36 nines consisting of three each par threes, par fours and par fives.
Moving further into the routing process the two nines will operate either as independent loops, what we call returning nines, or it will become one long loop, or a continuous routing. The returning nines is the more modern method; holes 1 and 10 leave the clubhouse and holes 9 and 18 return to the clubhouse. The obvious advantages include:
Driving traffic through the clubhouse for food, drinks and supplies mid round. A course with a solid and easily accessible grille and pro shop really benefits.
It also provides more opportunities for the staff watching over patrons to track progress. This is particularly crucial in a public facility where speed of play helps profitability.
Returning nines can also be helpful in the sense that if it ever becomes necessary to close one nine, patrons can still play the other nine.
The cons for returning nines might include the need for a lot more space around the clubhouse that is dedicated to golf. Walks from the parking lot might get longer and practice area locations might become more remote in relationship to the pro shop.
The continuous loop is, in simple terms, leaving the clubhouse at hole 1 and not returning until the 18th green. The round feels more like a journey. It is the old way. The Old Course at St. Andrews is a great example of a continuous routing.
There are infinite variations too. Sometimes a routing might find its way back to the clubhouse at hole 6, or 11. Sometimes the golf course might return to the clubhouse three or four times through the round. Six-hole loops are also interesting. Ideally, in a continuous loop situation, the course might be connected in a way that allows a player to play nine holes without a long ride in or out.
Contiguous golf. Over the last several decades, new golf has been driven by real estate. This has led to a preponderance of golf courses where each hole is surrounded by homes. This scenario can be done well, but it rarely is. Ancient golf and courses from the Golden Era were contiguous – just a glob of pure golfness.
When routing a golf course, the goal should be to string together a series of holes in a way that is interesting and diverse and that challenge usually lies in what the property has to offer with regard to contour and natural features. This is one of the aspects of golf design that is so fascinating… and challenging. Ideally, a site will have mild to moderate contour. Severe sites (one that is very steep) might drive the cost of constructing the course by 2x of what it might take to build a golf course on a gently rolling site. Severe sites can also cause limitations in routing the golf, and by this, I mean at some point the construction a hole will become cost prohibitive. What happens most commonly on severe sites is the golf starts to become disconnected, leaving long rides or walks between holes.
The connection between a green and the subsequent tees should be as short as possible. Approach the layout from the perspective of a walker. How quickly can the player get to the next tee? A better question to consider might be how quickly can the player get to the middle tees (since the overwhelming percentage of patrons play the middle tees)? During the layout process, make adjustments to the centerlines so the middle tees are the closest to the green. This is easier to accomplish with direction changes, but it can also be done with consecutive linear holes by shifting the following tee line left or right of the previous green site. An added bonus being the golf course is set up to add length in the future, if it becomes necessary.
Heavy residential development makes the connections between golf holes tricky. Ultimately, the client will dictate the residential density. In this situation, collaboration with the land planner is essential and hopefully, it will be possible to string together several holes between road crossings or other elements that might impact the connections.
There are no rules for organizing par, per se’. The lay of the land often has more influence on par sequence than anything else. However, interesting golf is usually the result of a nice mix of par and designers tend to have favorites. One designer might believe that the final three holes should include a par three, a par four and a par five – not necessarily in that order. Another might prefer the final hole to be the number 1 handicap hole (hardest) and so on. There are more opinions than options for sequencing par.
Our sequencing is almost always influenced by the topography. We study the land and explore multitudes of potential routings. And there are different ideals for public and private golf. For instance, in a public setting we might try to push the first par three to a place later in the round – perhaps hole 4 or hole 5. Since par threes in public golf tend to be a place where groups can stack up. Moving the par three later in the round gives the groups time to find a rhythm and space out (hopefully… this is public golf after all).
When routing a golf course, ideally, we like to have a diverse mix of yardages. One epic short par four, one or two very long par fours, one very long par five and one reachable par five, one short par three and one long par three. Also in an ideal situation, the long and short par fives will fall within the same nine holes, as will the short and long par threes. And if possible, the long and short par fives will be on the opposite nine of the long and short par threes. We have found that this combination helps with balance.
Additionally, we consider the prevailing wind. Whenever possible, the long holes will play into the wind and the short holes will play downwind, ensuring the long holes almost always play long and the short holes short. Uphill and downhill not only plays a role in the length of the holes but should also be balanced, when possible.
Doglegs should balance too, when possible. Of the par fours and par fives, in perfect circumstances, a routing will achieve a balance of right turns, left turns and straight holes. The math dictates that one of the three will be one short, say, five doglegs left, five straight and four doglegs right.
There is much discussion regarding the necessary length for a golf course these days. Since the debut of the Titleist Pro V and the modern improvements in driver technology trailing close behind, length discussion has become quite contentious. Golf architect William Flynn (1890-1944) once quoted “soon golf courses will need to be 8,000 yards”. I’m not sure he thought it would take 9 decades, but nonetheless Flynn appears to have been quite prophetic. The length of a golf course is worthy of its own discussion and so we will leave it for now.
Uncle Bud
It all begins with an idea.
Late February 1969
South Miami
“So Mac,” which is what he called me since I was wrapped up in a blanket on his birthday in the nurse’s quarters, the temporary hospital on Fort Richardson Army base in Anchorage, Alaska, just days after the most severe recorded earthquake in history in 1964, “What would you like to do for your birthday?”
Without a moment’s hesitation, now almost five, I said, “Ride with Uncle Bud!”
“Whoa, that will be fun, and Uncle Bud will like it too,” dad said, referring to Bud Cowins, the dozer operator-shaper who was shaping my very first golf course design on Miller drive just west of Galloway Road, Hidden Valley Golf Course, just two blocks from our house from where we could ride a Cushman Truckster to the job. Bud had often taken me up into the cab as the two of them bounced along over the legendary Dade County coral rock.
Dad's job was to stand nearby and watch the forms appear as they were drawn on the plan, which Bud understood down to the smallest detail.
It turns out that Bud would be instrumental in our lives. He made dad's courses come alive, three of them, and opened the door for a phone call from Jack Nicklaus three years later when Jack was forming his own design company where he would meet, work with and become lifetime friends with both Jack and Jay Morrish. Though I did not know it at the time, I was having a lifetime experience looking over the hood of that old D7 Cat in Bud’s lap, smelling the diesel exhaust, feeling the bumps and sensing the machine’s power as the coral fell away before it’s blade. And it wasn’t for ten minutes. I would often be up there for an hour or more. Maybe it was just me, but Bud seemed to be even more productive with me in his lap, my little hands on top of Bud’s, working the levers. It would be a fib to say we were not having fun.
When it came time for a break, dad would take me off of the track when Bud lifted him down, and I would spin in his arms to wave goodbye to Uncle Bud, who was always smiling when we were around. He was a special man, and he retired from Troup Brothers Construction a few years later after decades of riding the iron. He made the Cupp boys into better people and we remember him fondly.
Blog Post Title Four
It all begins with an idea.
It all begins with an idea. Maybe you want to launch a business. Maybe you want to turn a hobby into something more. Or maybe you have a creative project to share with the world. Whatever it is, the way you tell your story online can make all the difference.
Don’t worry about sounding professional. Sound like you. There are over 1.5 billion websites out there, but your story is what’s going to separate this one from the rest. If you read the words back and don’t hear your own voice in your head, that’s a good sign you still have more work to do.
Be clear, be confident and don’t overthink it. The beauty of your story is that it’s going to continue to evolve and your site can evolve with it. Your goal should be to make it feel right for right now. Later will take care of itself. It always does.